Published: May 18, 2024
Unbelievable Job Listing: Quality Reliability Engineer Wanted for 63,000-Hour Workweek
Updated Thursday, April 25, 2024 at 12:00 AM CDT
Have you ever come across a job listing that left you scratching your head in disbelief? Well, get ready to be astounded because we've stumbled upon a mind-boggling job posting that will make your jaw drop. Introducing the Quality Reliability Engineer position with a minimum requirement of a staggering 63,000 hours per week!
Yes, you read that right. This screenshot from an online job listing reveals an absurd expectation for the ideal candidate. The image displays the job title, "Quality Reliability Engineer," followed by a grey rectangle concealing the company's name. But that's just the beginning of this jaw-dropping revelation.
Listed under the job title are a series of green checkmarks, indicating certain details about the position. The first checkmark proudly boasts a salary starting from $110,000 per year. Not bad, right? Well, hold on tight because it's about to get even more bewildering.
The next checkmark declares that this is a full-time position. Now, this might seem like a reasonable expectation, but brace yourself for what comes next. The caption boldly states, "Minimum of 63,000 hours per week." Yes, you read that correctly. 63,000 hours. In a single week.
Now, you might be wondering if this is some sort of typo or technical error. And you would be absolutely correct! It is humanly impossible to work that many hours in a week. With only 168 hours available in a week, this job listing is clearly a mathematical enigma.
However, despite the obvious mistake, the listing does offer a glimmer of hope. A green checkmark assures potential applicants that the workweek is limited to Monday through Friday. Perhaps this is a small consolation, but in the face of the 63,000-hour requirement, it hardly seems significant.
At the bottom of the image, we find the words "Easily apply," suggesting that the application process for this mind-boggling position is straightforward. But who in their right mind would willingly subject themselves to such an outrageous work expectation?
As expected, the online community had a field day with this unbelievable job listing. User comments poured in, ranging from humorous observations to genuine disbelief. Some users jokingly suggested alternative interpretations, like "2.8 years a week," while others pointed out the need for a "quantity engineer" instead of a quality engineer.
One Reddit user wittily referenced the movie "Cinderella Man," quoting, "If I work 26 hours out of every 24, it still won't add up." Another user humorously speculated that the company's management must be traveling at the speed of light to make 63,000 hours feasible.
While the job listing may have sparked amusement and incredulity among internet users, it's important to remember that unrealistic work expectations can have serious consequences for employees' well-being and work-life balance. Despite the allure of a high salary, it's crucial to prioritize our mental and physical health.
This mind-boggling job listing for a Quality Reliability Engineer with a minimum requirement of 63,000 hours per week has left us all in awe. Although it may be an inadvertent error, it serves as a reminder to be cautious of unrealistic work expectations. Let's focus on finding opportunities that value our well-being and prioritize a healthy work-life balance.
Noticed an error or an aspect of this article that requires correction? Please provide the article link and reach out to us. We appreciate your feedback and will address the issue promptly.
View source: Reddit
Top Comments from Reddit
Check out our latest stories
-
The Science Behind Stomach Grumbles: Unraveling the Mystery of Borborygmus
-
Breaking the Stereotype: Challenging Assumptions about Americans
Published: May 18, 2024
-
The Emotional Rollercoaster: Unveiling the Dark Side of Relationships
Published: May 18, 2024
-
The Influence of Coat Color on Cat Behavior: Fact or Fiction?
Published: May 18, 2024
-
Respecting Boundaries: The Debate Over Collecting Phones at Weddings
Published: May 18, 2024
-
The Power of Decibels: Exploring Sound Measurement and Perception
Published: May 18, 2024
-
Military Technology: Unveiling the Advanced Innovations Beyond Public Awareness
Published: May 18, 2024
-
Epcot: A Nostalgic Journey or Outdated Experience?
Published: May 18, 2024
-
The Great Chili Debate: To Bean or Not to Bean?
Published: May 18, 2024
-
The Disillusionment of Childhood Expectations: From Extreme Sports to a New Perspective
Published: May 18, 2024
-
The Intricate Dance: Understanding the Lengthy Nature of Complex Surgeries
Published: May 18, 2024
-
The Rise and Fall of Google Glass: A Failed Wearable Device
Published: May 18, 2024
-
The Importance of Self-Praise: Embracing Confidence and Self-Validation
Published: May 18, 2024
-
How Health Conditions Can Unexpectedly Bring Benefits to Your Life
Published: May 18, 2024
-
Understanding the Safety of Fresh Uranium Fuel and the Hazards of Spent Fuel
Published: May 18, 2024
-
The Rise and Controversy of Celebrity Roasts: Unveiling the Humor Behind Public Humiliation
Published: May 18, 2024
-
Taylor Swift: A Musical Icon and Marketing Genius
Published: May 18, 2024
-
The Unwinding Routine: A Man's Journey from Work to Relaxation
Published: May 18, 2024
-
The Fascinating History of Castrati: From Aristocratic Novelties to Church Choirs
Published: May 18, 2024
-
High Stakes in Georgia and Kentucky Primaries as Voters Head to the Polls
Published: May 18, 2024