Cunningham's Law in Action: Zany Exchange on Prime Numbers and Riemann Hypothesis

Zoey Waverider

Updated Friday, June 21, 2024 at 12:00 AM CDT

An image circulating online showcases a humorous exchange that perfectly illustrates Cunningham's Law. This principle suggests that the best way to get the correct answer on the internet is not to ask a question but to post the wrong answer. The image features a post by a user named "amwult," who boldly claims to have found a flaw in the Riemann hypothesis and can prove that the number 1705542 is a prime number. The user then seeks advice on how to publish this supposed groundbreaking proof.

The post reads:

"I found a flaw in the Riemann hypothesis and can prove that 1705542 is a prime number. How can I get my proof published?"

The response from another user, Dana F Anderson, who is labeled as an "Author" with 10.2K answers and 7.5M answer views, is both swift and brutally honest. Dana points out:

"The prime factors of 1705542 are 2 x 3 x 17 x 23 x 727. You have NO proof, and will NEVER be published - except possibly in the BOOK OF IDIOTS."

This sharp reply not only corrects the original claim but also adds a dose of humor, making it clear that the original poster's assertion was far from accurate.

The image also includes a comment from the user "twentyfourlivesforinfinity," who notes:

"#it really is that easy to get someone else to do your homework online huh."

This exchange has garnered numerous reactions, with users pointing out the effectiveness of Cunningham's Law. One user commented on the irony of the situation, suggesting that the homework assignment was likely to find the prime factors rather than proving an even number to be prime. Another user humorously referenced Anthony Bourdain's concept of "provoking nerd fury," where a wrong answer sparks a flurry of corrections.

Interestingly, another comment draws a parallel to the Riemann hypothesis, sharing a quirky anecdote about a clairvoyant on Polish late-night TV programs who claimed the cards confirmed the hypothesis to be true.

In essence, this image is a perfect example of how incorrect information can quickly be corrected online, often with a touch of wit and humor. The exchange not only provides a good laugh but also serves as a reminder of the power of community knowledge and the fun that comes with proving someone wrong.

Noticed an error or an aspect of this article that requires correction? Please provide the article link and reach out to us. We appreciate your feedback and will address the issue promptly.

View source: Imgur

Top Comments from Imgur

Lomish

i mean, i woulda skipped quite a bit of the work and just said "it's even."

notacobra

Just wait until AI comes along and writes a proof for an even number being prime

MingleMaestro

I'd guess that the homework was to find the prime factors, not show an even number was prime. The poster is applying Cunningham's Law.

bottledham

This reminds me of how you get an answer to a question people are ignoring. Login with another ID and give the wrong answer. Suddenly several people will respond with the right answer because proving someone wrong is more fun than just answering the original question.

DarkwingDuc

Anthony Bourdain called it "provoking nerd fury". If you ask a question online, few will bother to help. But if you proudly proclaim a wrong answer, you will get a flood of replies telling you how and why you're wrong. https://www.thekitchn.com/anthony-bourdain-restaurant-tip-while-traveling-256807

XennialZaddy

There's not a lot of even prime numbers....only two.

spyboy70

This is just like making a burner account on Reddit to incorrectly answer a question you post on your real account, because people won't answer when asked directly, but are always willing to correct someone who's wrong. Probably called the Ackchyually Hypothesis or something

Ifekinlovesauerk****

Every university's basement has at least one thesis hidden in a dusty corner that starts like this.

AeonQuasars

I also want some of that homewok. Sound delicious

Atomic2

What does this have to do with the Riemann hypothesis though?

Check out our latest stories