The First Law: How Robots Teach Humanity Compassion

Noah Silverbrook

Updated Thursday, July 25, 2024 at 12:00 AM CDT

An intriguing image making rounds on Imgur has sparked deep discussions about the ethical implications of Isaac Asimov's First Law of Robotics. The image contains a poignant narrative that has resonated strongly with many, shedding light on how society often neglects those in need while wasting resources.

The text begins with a reflection on the harsh realities faced by workers in fast-food chains, where a family of four struggles to share a ten-piece McNuggets meal, unable to afford anything more while still managing to pay for gas. The narrative paints a vivid picture of desperation, recounting how individuals would linger for even a cold french fry. In stark contrast, the text describes how affluent customers would disdainfully resist paying a mere fifty cents for an extra sauce cup, highlighting the disparity between the haves and the have-nots.

The employees, moved by the plight of the hungry, attempted to find a solution. They decided to gather food that was destined for the trash and distribute it to those in need. However, this act of kindness was met with resistance, underscoring the complexities and bureaucratic hurdles that often stymie well-intentioned efforts.

The narrative then takes a philosophical turn, invoking Asimov's First Law of Robotics: "A robot cannot harm a human, or by inaction, allow a human to come to harm." This principle serves as a powerful reminder that inaction in the face of suffering is itself a form of harm. The text concludes with a call to action, urging humans to embody the compassion and ethical standards that Asimov envisioned for robots.

The comments on the post further enrich the discussion. A user named Asimov highlights the fundamental rule enabling Asimov's robots to function effectively. Another comment recounts a personal experience from a former KFC employee in Orlando, who was fired for attempting to ensure leftover food reached the homeless. This comment underscores the systemic issues that prevent food from reaching those in need.

Other comments delve into the broader implications of AI and automation, with users expressing skepticism about the integration of ethical principles like Asimov's Three Laws into modern AI. The conversation also touches on the societal and corporate dynamics that would likely limit the application of these laws.

A poignant quote from John Steinbeck’s "Grapes of Wrath" shared in the comments echoes the image's message about the tragic consequences of profit-driven policies that lead to food wastage while people starve. This sentiment is reinforced by anecdotes from former employees of various food chains, who witnessed the daily disposal of perfectly edible food that could have fed hundreds.

The image and the ensuing discussion serve as a powerful reminder of the moral responsibilities that come with technological and societal advancements. Asimov's First Law challenges humanity to act with compassion and prevent harm, urging a reflection on how society can better address the needs of the vulnerable and disadvantaged.

Noticed an error or an aspect of this article that requires correction? Please provide the article link and reach out to us. We appreciate your feedback and will address the issue promptly.

View source: Imgur

Top Comments from Imgur

feanoreldar

Asimov

T410N

All other laws, including their own survival and obeying humans, are superseded by this law. That’s the fundamental rule which allows Asimov robots to function they way they be o

PTKrieg

Wet blanket time: Modern "AI"/automation isn't advanced enough to have principles like Asimov's Three Laws baked it, and even if it were corporations wouldn't integrate it for fear of missing out on those sweet, sweet military/police contracts.

FoxPeregrine

I was fired from KFC in Orlando because I packed up all the food that was left at the end of the night and left on a chair next to the dumpster that the homeless used to dive into to find food. The manager told me if I didn't spread the food around the dumpster and destroy it, I would be fired. I kept doing it my way and stayed working there because I knew I was the only person that would make sure their food was safe. Eventually I was caught again and fired

CaptainScarfish

Y'all have never actually read Asimov and it shows. The three laws were pretty explicitly described as insufficient. They were meant to illustrate how ironclad logic to a human mind can be dismantled and effectively ignored by a digital mind capable of outmaneuvering our squishy flesh thinkers.

angusd

The author makes the mistake in believing that those laws would be applied to all humans. Companies would find ways to limit those laws to only a certain set of people. Social credit, social scoring, bank account, whatever. If you don't have enough credit, points or money, you're excempt from "The Laws". (That's how they define who's human and who's not!)

Ikwilstroopwaffels

“​There is a crime here that goes beyond denunciation. There is a sorrow here that weeping cannot symbolize. There is a failure here that topples all our success. The fertile earth, the straight tree rows, the sturdy trunks, and the ripe fruit. And the children dying of pellagra must die because a profit cannot be taken from an orange. And coroners must fill the certificates - died of malnutrition - because the food must rot, must be forced to rot." -John Steinbeck

ApothecaryGrant

Grapes of Wrath. I remember working in a produce dept and we had to keep a massive cardboard bin about waist-height for dumping "expired" food. Every day it would be filled to the top with a mountain of ready-made sandwiches, donuts, bagels, fruit, salads, pizzas, cookies, bread, just tons of food that was perfectly edible, but not sellable. Every day we could have fed hundreds with that box of food. Every. Single. Day. We couldn't even nibble on it ourselves or we'd be fired for "grazing."

marsilies

The reason companies won't let staff take extra food home and insist they throw it out is because some employees will abuse it if you let them take the food. I saw this when I was working at Hardees as a teen. The managers let us take leftover food home, but then a new guy decided to make WAY TOO MUCH FOOD right before closing, and then packed it up and took it home as "leftover" food. That guy didn't last long. So a few bad actors spoil it for everyone.

MyLastAccountWasShadowbanned

Some of my beliefs about AGI: 1) In the long term, it won't be a neural replica of a human, as we already have lots of humans at hand, so such simulations will only be of use in neurological research. 2) The only long-term safe optimization goal is universal benevolence.

Check out our latest stories