Oil and Gas Industry's Risky Response to Greenwashing Law: Experts Weigh In

Aiden Starling

Updated Monday, June 24, 2024 at 12:00 AM CDT

The oil and gas industry is under scrutiny following its controversial reaction to new greenwashing regulations. In an article by Ian Bickis, published on June 22, 2024, communications experts argue that the industry's actions are perilous, but necessary. The article, featured in The Canadian Press, delves into the complexities surrounding these new rules and the industry's response.

The image accompanying the article captures a poignant moment at a protest. Two individuals are depicted: one standing and holding a large banner, and another crouched down, seemingly writing or painting on the ground with a long stick or pole. The protest banner prominently displays messages such as "bp=broken promises," "TAR SANDS OIL CAN'T BE GREENWASHED," and "GREENPEACE." The setting is outdoors, with the protestors dressed casually and deeply engaged in their advocacy activities.

Commentary on the issue has been fervent. One reader remarked, "You say that we have free speech, but then you get mad when we lie. Curious." This sentiment echoes the frustration of many who believe that the industry's longstanding deceptions have caused significant environmental damage. Another reader suggested a more stringent approach, "This is the alternative we've worked out to kicking your door in and beating you to death in front of your family. You want this to work."

The discussion also touched on legal loopholes, with one commenter noting, "So they will start a shell company and give them the responsibility of the burden of proof. Basically they write a promise and the oil company pays for it. The audit won’t work, the shell company collapses. Rinse and repeat."

The debate over freedom of communications was highlighted by another reader who sarcastically pointed out, "A serious threat to freedom of communications = We can't lie with impunity, big oil sad." Another comment questioned the logic behind the industry's stance, "How the ever living heck does proving you are being somewhat green threaten your freedom of communication??? If any company can't prove it then the answer is they aren't doing it to begin with."

The frustration is palpable among the public, with one reader expressing anger over the disparity in environmental responsibility, "It p***es me off to no end, that we're made to feel guilty for not rinsing out our glass jars properly before recycling them, we suffer though trying to consume thickshakes through paper straws etc. And these b******s will spend millions fighting any legislation that means they might have to use a minuscule fraction of a percent of potential profit to do the right thing."

Historical context adds another layer to the conversation. One reader recalled the infamous BP oil spill, "Remember when BP leaked a bunch of oil from deep in the ocean, and it ruined the Gulf of Mexico?" This reference underscores the lingering distrust and disappointment in the industry's environmental practices.

The oil and gas industry's response to greenwashing laws has sparked intense debate and criticism. The article by Ian Bickis and the accompanying protest image highlight the ongoing struggle for environmental accountability and the public's demand for truth and transparency in corporate practices.

Noticed an error or an aspect of this article that requires correction? Please provide the article link and reach out to us. We appreciate your feedback and will address the issue promptly.

View source: Imgur

Top Comments from Imgur

ElbowDeepInUserSub

"You say that we have free speech, but then you get mad when we lie. Curious."

MagicSpiderP***Hat

They've lied for decades and caused incalculable damage to life on earth simply to make more money. Now they're mad they can't keep doing it. I suggest a slight variation to an old classic as a response: "This is the alternative we've worked out to kicking your door in and beating you to death in front of your family. You want this to work."

KnightWithShiningCamera

So they will start a shell company and give them the responsibility of the burden of proof. Basically they write a promise and the oil company pays for it. The audit won’t work, the shell company collapses. Rinse and repeat

JacktheKind

"A serious threat to **freedom of communications** " = We can't lie with impunity, big oil sad.

hotaru251

...how the ever living heck does proving you are being somewhat green threaten your freedom of communication??? If any company can't prove it then the answer is they arent doing it to begin with.

TheSupremeCrabMaster

Today's rich and powerful have forgotten that, if history is any indication, we're approaching the point where people start killing them over this s***.

PicassoCT

https://pudding.cool/2024/06/climate-zones/ Not in the graph: Wet-Bulb-Death-Zone

Isorikk

Unfortunately free speech doesn't cover lying to the public

spittytrinkles

it p***es me off to no end, that we're made to feel guilty for not rinsing out our glass jars properly before recycling them, we suffer though trying to consume thickshakes through paper straws etc. And these b******s will spend millions fighting any legislation that means they might have to use a miniscule fraction of a percent of potential profit to do the right thing.

ttm2

Psychopaths hate it when they're forbidden from lying, news at 11.

Check out our latest stories