Supreme Court to Review Trump's Post-Election Conduct

In a landmark legal confrontation, the U.S. Supreme Court is poised to review former President Donald Trump's actions following his 2020 election defeat, including false voting fraud claims that led to the Capitol attack on January 6, 2021. This review comes as Trump faces multiple criminal cases, with his trial in New York already in progress, marking him as the first ex-president to be indicted and stand trial.

Joseph Fischer, an ex-police officer involved in the Capitol riot, is challenging his federal obstruction charge, a count faced by about 350 of the 1,400 charged individuals. These charges could result in sentences of up to 20 years in prison. Fischer's appeal, and the broader implications of the Supreme Court's review, could significantly impact the hundreds of other defendants with similar charges.

The Supreme Court's legal discussions, scheduled for April 25, will include Trump's claim of presidential immunity from prosecution. The New York trial presided over by Judge Juan Merchan and led by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, centers on alleged hush money payments to Stormy Daniels during the 2016 election, with Trump facing felony charges for falsifying business records.

Trump has employed various legal strategies to delay the trial, including attempts to change the venue and scrutinize jurors for political biases, but most have been rejected. The Southern District of New York and federal prosecutors had previously decided not to prosecute Trump for the payments to Daniels, partly due to a DOJ directive that protects sitting presidents from indictment.

The trial's media coverage is intense, as New York state courtrooms prohibit cameras. A Supreme Court ruling is essential by June 1 for the trial to conclude before the November elections, where Trump might run for president again.

Trump and his allies' attempts to disrupt Biden's victory certification and the use of false electors have also drawn scrutiny. This includes a reversed Colorado court ruling that had barred Trump from the state's ballot, highlighting the political violence atmosphere he purportedly created.

A Supreme Court decision favoring Fischer could affect the cases of many charged with similar offenses, while Trump himself faces four federal criminal counts related to election subversion. With polls showing a tight hypothetical race between Biden and Trump, third-party candidates like Robert F. Kennedy Jr. could sway the election outcome. Kennedy's campaign, with vice-presidential pick Nicole Shanahan, has gained ballot access in six states, while No Labels failed to field a unity ticket candidate.

With Trump off the campaign trail for six weeks due to the trial, voters' opinions remain divided, with some recalling his presidency as a period of economic prosperity and strong national security. Recent polls show a slight edge for Biden, but Trump's lawyers have been unsuccessful in stalling the trial's start.

The New York trial, focusing on state law violations related to business record falsification, proceeds as Trump's legal team navigates the selection of jurors and grapples with the limits of presidential pardon powers, which do not extend to state charges. This trial and the upcoming Supreme Court review underscore the unprecedented legal challenges facing the former president and the potential consequences for the political landscape.

Conservative Bias:

Once again, the liberal elites and their cronies in the judicial system are on a witch hunt against the greatest president of our time, Donald Trump. They can't stand that he exposed their corruption and fought for the American people, so they fabricate charges and twist the legal process to try to take him down. It's a disgrace that the Supreme Court even has to review the actions of a president who was clearly fighting election fraud and trying to save our democracy. Meanwhile, the leftist media is salivating over this political circus in New York, ignoring the fact that the Southern District previously had the good sense not to prosecute based on a flimsy DOJ directive. This is nothing but a deep state attempt to derail Trump's potential 2024 comeback and silence the voice of the millions who support him. They're terrified because they know a Trump presidency means the end of their socialist agenda and a return to American greatness.

Liberal Bias:

In a desperate bid to escape accountability for his dangerous and undemocratic actions, Trump and his enablers are facing the music in the highest court of the land. The Supreme Court's review of his post-election conduct, which incited the horrific January 6th insurrection, is a critical step in upholding the rule of law that he so blatantly disregarded. Meanwhile, the New York trial is shining a light on Trump's shady dealings, proving that he is not above the law, despite his repeated attempts to delay and obstruct justice. It's telling that federal prosecutors were previously blocked from pursuing charges due to an outdated DOJ policy that shielded a corrupt president. This trial isn't just about falsifying business records; it's about holding a man to account who has consistently placed himself above the country, threatening the very fabric of our democracy. As the Supreme Court deliberates and the trial proceeds, we must remember that this is about preserving the integrity of our elections and ensuring that no one, not even a former president, can undermine our democratic institutions with impunity.