Published: May 16, 2024
Should a 73 be the Determining Factor for Passing a Class?
Updated Monday, April 29, 2024 at 12:05 PM CDT
The Debate Over the Passing Mark
Passing a class is a significant milestone for students, but the question arises: should a 73 be the determining factor? This debate has sparked discussions among educators, students, and parents alike. While some argue that a passing mark of 73 is fair, others believe that it is arbitrary and fails to account for the effort put in by students. Let's delve into this topic further and explore the different perspectives.
Some argue that retaking an entire class due to missing the passing mark by one point is a waste of time and money. They suggest that a passing mark of 70 would still leave some students missing the mark by a small margin. This perspective highlights the need for a more flexible approach to grading, where students are not penalized excessively for falling just short of the passing mark.
On the other hand, proponents of the current system argue that a percentage grading scale is arbitrary, and there is no clear line between passing and failing. They raise the question of what percentage failure rate should be considered enough to fail, highlighting the subjectivity of determining passing grades. They believe that a higher passing mark encourages students to put in more effort and strive for better grades.
Blaming the system for wasting time is seen by some as deflecting responsibility. They emphasize that students are accountable for their own performance and should put in the necessary effort to meet the passing mark. This perspective highlights the importance of personal effort and responsibility in achieving passing grades.
Another argument suggests that students who barely pass should not receive the same credit hours as those who excel in the course. This viewpoint proposes a differentiation in credit hour allocation based on performance. By doing so, students who excel would be rewarded appropriately, while those who barely pass would be encouraged to put in more effort to improve their understanding of the subject matter.
In some countries, there are make-up tests for students who failed but came close to passing. This approach provides an opportunity for students to demonstrate their understanding of the material and potentially raise their grades. However, it is important to note that currently, US universities do not have a system of make-up tests.
Until a system of make-up tests is implemented, proponents argue that the current grading system should remain in place. They believe that the existing system motivates students to work harder to avoid retaking classes and provides a clear benchmark for passing.
The debate surrounding grading systems in education is subjective and multifaceted. It raises questions about the fairness and practicality of setting specific passing marks. While there may not be a perfect grading system, it is crucial to acknowledge the importance of personal effort and responsibility in achieving passing grades.
The ongoing discussions and varying perspectives spark a broader conversation about the purpose and effectiveness of grading systems in education. It is essential to continuously evaluate and adapt these systems to ensure they encourage learning and growth while providing fair assessments of students' knowledge and abilities.
Noticed an error or an aspect of this article that requires correction? Please provide the article link and reach out to us. We appreciate your feedback and will address the issue promptly.
Check out our latest stories
-
The Hidden Gems of Enjoyable Professions
-
CrossFit vs. Traditional Weightlifting: Debunking the Myths and Exploring the Benefits
Published: May 16, 2024
-
Unraveling the Enigma: Decoding Centaurs' Arm Movement During Running
Published: May 16, 2024
-
High Stakes in US v. Menendez
Published: May 16, 2024
-
Debunking the Myth: Are Canadians Really as Nice as They Are Portrayed?
Published: May 16, 2024
-
The Decline of Altra: A Lesson in Private Equity Acquisitions
Published: May 16, 2024
-
The Impact of Quick Transportation on PTSD Rates: A Comparison of Vietnam War and Previous Wars
Published: May 16, 2024
-
The Truth About Inaccurate Scales: Why Your Doctor's Scale May Show a Higher Weight
Published: May 16, 2024
-
The Universal Speed Limit: Exploring the Fascinating World of the Speed of Light
Published: May 16, 2024
-
Controversy Resurfaces for Ohio Rep. Marcy Kaptur as Election Looms
Published: May 16, 2024
-
The Controversy of Doping in Bodybuilding: Separate Categories and Ethical Concerns
Published: May 15, 2024
-
The Future of Politics: Leaked Nudes and the Normalization of Scandals
Published: May 15, 2024
-
The Alarming Rise of Spelling Mistakes in Online Communication
Published: May 15, 2024
-
Epicurious Kitchen Gadgets: Unboxing, Reviews, and Tests - Insights from an Industrial Designer
Published: May 15, 2024
-
The Evolution of Video Calls: From Cellular Networks to App Dominance
Published: May 15, 2024
-
The Misconceptions of Rights: Exploring the Boundaries of Free Speech and Privileges
Published: May 15, 2024
-
The Truth About Personal Trainers: Unveiling the Dark Side of Commercial Gyms
Published: May 15, 2024
-
Unconventional Warfare: From Annie Oakley to Bat Bombs
Published: May 15, 2024
-
The Evolution of Corn Hole: From a Child's Game to a Popular Pastime
Published: May 15, 2024
-
The Caloric Density of Potato Chips: How Water and Oil Affect Calories
Published: May 15, 2024