Laughable Comic Strip Explores 'True Altruism' with a Twist

Jaxon Wildwood

Updated Monday, August 26, 2024 at 12:00 AM CDT

A comic strip shared on Reddit titled "True Altruism" has sparked an engaging discussion, blending humor with philosophical musings on the nature of selflessness. This four-panel comic features a person with short hair holding a microphone and another character wearing dark sunglasses with one eye covered by a patch, delving into the paradox of altruism.

**First Panel:**

The interviewer, a person with short hair, congratulates the person with sunglasses, saying, "Congratulations! You've achieved true altruism." The person with sunglasses listens intently.

**Second Panel:**

The scene shifts to a list of monumental achievements enumerated by the interviewer:

- "You sold all your possessions."

- "Gave away your wealth."

- "And donated an eye, a kidney, and part of your liver to those in need."

- "And never asked for anything in return."

In the background, silhouettes of two people are engaged in conversation, adding depth to the scene.

**Third Panel:**

The interviewer then poses a critical question, "How do you feel?" The person with sunglasses, after a moment of contemplation, responds, "I feel...good?"

**Fourth Panel:**

The person with sunglasses suddenly realizes the implications, expressing shock and covering their face with their hands, exclaiming, "Oh no." The final speech bubble intensifies the humor with, "Oh f*** no."

This comic cleverly illustrates the concept of altruism, questioning whether true altruism exists if the 'giver' derives any form of satisfaction or acknowledgment. Reddit users chimed in with their insights:

One user noted, "Interestingly, the leading evolutionary theory regarding why altruism exists is called 'reciprocal altruism.'" They explained that altruistic acts often aim to gain social credibility and trust, which are eventually reciprocated.

Another user humorously pointed out, "Lol. The joke here is that 'true altruism' doesn't exist because the 'giver' always gets something from the action—even if it's only 'feeling good' about themselves."

A fan of the show Friends recognized the theme, commenting, "There's an old episode of Friends where Joey says that there is no such thing as a completely selfless act. This flustered Phoebe, who then tried to find a way to do a completely selfless act."

The comic also invited debates about the definition of altruism. One user emphasized, "If your definition of something excludes virtually every possible instance of that something, it's a crummy definition."

The comic strip not only entertained but also provided a platform for thought-provoking discussions on the essence of selflessness. Whether you side with evolutionary theories or philosophical musings, this comic captures the hilarity and complexity of 'true altruism' in a memorable way.

Noticed an error or an aspect of this article that requires correction? Please provide the article link and reach out to us. We appreciate your feedback and will address the issue promptly.

View source: Reddit

Top Comments from Reddit

velvetcrow5

Interestingly, the leading evolutionary theory regarding why altruism exists, is called "reciprocal altruism" (corrected, ty). Essentially, we act altruistic to gain social credibility and trust from our tribe. That trust is then paid back by several magnitudes over our entire life. A truly altruistic act is therefore done when there is zero chance of your act being discovered/seen. When you apply this rule, 99%+ altruistic acts don't count.

PacManFan123

Lol. The joke here is that 'true altruism' doesn't exist because the 'giver' always gets something from the action- even if it's only 'feeling good' about themselves. Because they received something, it wasn't true altruism.

mongooseme

I saw this episode of Friends.

Aaron_Tia

I acheived tru altruism with my ex. 🤓 She got healing process, support, inconditional love. I got breakup. I feel down therefore, I win the contest 😁

ReasonablyBadass

I never understood that. Don't we want that? people who feel pleasure form good acts? Why would that be a bad thing?

perldawg

one could argue that the character’s ‘altruism’ is undermined in the first panel, given that he’s granted an interview acknowledging his acts

Elden_Storm-Touch

I read that as true autism at first, and was very confused.

MeanderingDuck

That as a side effect of that he felt good, doesn’t mean it wasn’t altruistic.

Zormac

What's the joke here?

AlsiusArcticus

This isn't funny whatsoever

Check out our latest stories