Joanna Maciejewska Wants AI to Do Chores, Not Art - The Great AI Debate Unveiled

Mason Riverwind

Updated Tuesday, April 2, 2024 at 7:00 PM CDT

In a thought-provoking tweet that has garnered an impressive 430K views, Joanna Maciejewska, known as @AuthorJMac on social media, expressed her concerns about the direction in which artificial intelligence (AI) is being pushed. The tweet, posted at 4:50 AM on March 29th, 2024, highlights the clash between the desire to use AI to alleviate mundane tasks and the fear that it may take over creative endeavors.

With a dark mode color scheme and white and light gray text, the screenshot of the tweet captivates attention from the moment you lay your eyes on it. Accompanied by a circular profile picture, Joanna Maciejewska, a person with shoulder-length hair and glasses, stares back at the viewer. Her username, @AuthorJMac, and a follow icon are displayed next to her profile picture, indicating her authority and influence in the writing community.

In the tweet itself, Joanna voices her frustration with the prevailing emphasis on AI in artistic creations, rather than in household chores. She asserts, "You know what the biggest problem with pushing all-things-AI is? Wrong direction. I want AI to do my laundry and dishes so that I can do art and writing, not for AI to do my art and writing so that I can do my laundry and dishes." Her words strike a chord with many, sparking a lively debate on the role of AI in our lives.

Commenters chimed in with various perspectives on the matter. One user cleverly quipped, "That's why they don't call it Artificial Labor." While another user argued that predictive language models, although labeled as "artificially intelligent," are still rudimentary and lack the ability to inter-compare, synthesize, analyze, and generate abstractions like the human brain can.

The discourse continued with comments expressing the distinction between AI and robotics, pointing out that AI is primarily developed by businesses to solve business issues. Others raised concerns about the quality of AI-generated art and writing, stating that it often lacks creativity and uniqueness. Additionally, there were those who highlighted the potential negative implications of AI, such as scam callers and the fear of job loss.

Interestingly, some commenters drew attention to the irony of our desire to automate menial tasks while neglecting the most valuable pursuits, thanks to capitalism. They argued that AI should focus on chores rather than creative endeavors, allowing humans more time and freedom to pursue art as a hobby.

Although the debate on AI's role in our lives remains complex and multifaceted, Joanna Maciejewska's tweet has certainly ignited a passionate discussion. As technology continues to evolve, it is crucial to strike a balance between leveraging AI for convenience and preserving the essence of human creativity.

As we navigate the ever-changing landscape of AI, it is important to remember that the ultimate goal should be to enhance our lives, complementing our pursuits rather than replacing them. Let us harness the power of AI to liberate ourselves from mundane tasks, enabling us to unleash our artistic potential.

Noticed an error or an aspect of this article that requires correction? Please provide the article link and reach out to us. We appreciate your feedback and will address the issue promptly.

View source: Imgur

Top Comments from Imgur

nosnowyno

That’s why they don’t call it Artificial Labor

EnhydraLutra

I hate that we have such a generalized term for this. Predictive language models are... "artificially intelligent" but in an extremely rudimentary way. It's essentially just trying to give you the most generalized response possible (be that text or images or whatever). They're basically just good at guessing sequences. But to paraphrase one of my heroes, the brain does more than just predict; it inter-compares, it synthesizes, it analyzes, it generates abstractions. No "AI" does that yet.

DoseOfScience

Sounds like your issue is with capitalism, not AI.

Snooj

That's not AI, that's robotics and engineering.

Mrlmgur

AI is smart enough to not get stuck doing dishes

marklearnstech

funding for AI has been basically garbage until the past few years. From the 1970s to the 2000s AI was mostly described in terms of the AI winters. Huge swaths of the technology in use for this neat new s*** is half a century old. Compute finally caught up enough that things got weird, but the industry is just as over-eager as ever. If I can make a movie in 30 seconds with Sora, what value does a Hollywood studio doing it have? AI CGI is still CGI. The magic is really doing it.

krstd

AI is developed by businesses for businesses to solve businesses issues.

JohnWickdidnothingwrong

They aren't being used to do art and writing. They're being used to procedurally generate *garbage* that is being sold as art and writing.

LeSethX

The worst are AI scam callers. I genuinely, without a hesitation of a doubt, wish that such people involved have a fatale heart attack while driving and kill their entire family due to how bad this AI s*** is. Mods, you know this to be true!

michiyl

And that's why not all stuff is AI yet. Most are a bit more sophisticated (text) generators, with maybe some learned pattern.

Check out our latest stories