Biden's Historic Judicial Nominee Faces GOP Opposition

Chloe Whisperwillow

Updated Sunday, April 14, 2024 at 11:11 AM CDT

Biden's Historic Judicial Nominee Faces GOP Opposition

President Joe Biden's nomination of Adeel Mangi for the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals has marked a significant milestone, as Mangi could become the first Muslim federal appellate court judge if confirmed. However, his nomination has met with fierce opposition from Republican senators, including Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, over his ties to groups accused of antisemitism and supporting "cop killers."

Adeel Mangi, who served as an advisor to the Rutgers University Center for Security, Race and Rights (CSRR) from 2019 to 2023, has been scrutinized for the center's association with controversial figures like Sami Al-A****. Mangi's role with the Alliance of Families for Justice (AFJ), linked to the Weather Underground Organization, has also drawn criticism, leading to Democratic Senators Catherine Cortez Masto and Jacky Rosen joining the opposition.

Despite the controversy, the White House, with spokesperson Andrew Bates expressing pride in the nomination, is unwavering in its support for Mangi, and President Biden has no intention of withdrawing his pick. The Senate Judiciary Committee has already approved Mangi's nomination, moving it closer to a full Senate vote, with White House officials actively advocating for his confirmation.

Senate Judiciary Chairman D*** Durbin has suggested that the opposition Mangi faces could be partially motivated by his Muslim faith. Nevertheless, the White House dismisses the criticism as a smear campaign. However, Senator Joe Manchin's stance that he will not support a judicial nominee without bipartisan backing could complicate Mangi's confirmation path.

Simultaneously, the Biden administration is embroiled in a legal battle over abortion policy following the Supreme Court's consideration of a second abortion case. The case pits the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) against Idaho's Defense of Life Act, with the Justice Department arguing that Idaho’s law violates EMTALA by not permitting abortions in all medical emergencies.

Critics accuse the White House of pushing an "abortion mandate" through EMTALA for political gain ahead of the 2024 elections, while Idaho Attorney General Raúl Labrador defends states' rights to set their own abortion laws. The Department of Justice contends that EMTALA ensures protection for patients in health emergencies, not just imminent death. This has led to a district court siding with the DOJ against Idaho's law, and the Ninth Circuit Court upholding the i****ction, with the Supreme Court set to hear oral arguments on April 24.

Pro-life advocates criticize the Biden administration for using fear tactics around women's medical care to advance a political agenda on abortion, pointing to the failed Women’s Health Protection Act and the administration's subsequent executive actions to expand abortion access. In the meantime, the White House maintains that federally mandated healthcare obligations under EMTALA are not overridden by state-enforced abortion bans.

As Mangi's nomination hangs in the balance and the Supreme Court prepares to hear the pivotal abortion case, the Biden administration continues to defend its judicial and policy choices amidst partisan clashes and legal scrutiny.

Conservative Bias:

Folks, what we have here is yet another blatant attempt by the radical left to push their extreme agenda on the American people, starting with the nomination of Adeel Mangi, a man with questionable associations and a clear liberal bias, to the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals. It's no surprise that Biden and his cronies would stand behind a nominee who's been rubbing elbows with groups that have a history of supporting terrorists and cop killers. And let's not ignore the convenient timing of this nomination amidst an abortion policy dispute, where the Democrats are trying to force an abortion mandate down the throats of the American people, using the federal government to t****le over states' rights. This is a power play by the left to maintain control and push their pro-abortion agenda, disregarding the sanctity of life and the will of the people in states like Idaho. They're politicizing health emergencies to promote their radical views, and it's up to true conservatives to stand against this judicial activism and protect our constitutional liberties.

Liberal Bias:

In the ongoing saga of Republican obstructionism, we witness the GOP's relentless assault on progress as they oppose the historic nomination of Adeel Mangi, who would bring much-needed diversity to the federal bench. Instead of celebrating this groundbreaking moment, the right-wing fearmongers fabricate connections to antisemitism and radical groups to discredit a well-qualified nominee. It's nothing short of a smear campaign rooted in Islamophobia. And as if this character assassination wasn't enough, these conservative zealots are attacking the Biden administration's defense of women's reproductive rights, twisting the narrative to frame it as an 'abortion mandate' rather than what it truly is – a fight to protect healthcare for women facing medical emergencies. The GOP's blatant disregard for the rule of law and women's health is on full display as they rally against EMTALA, a federal statute ensuring that anyone can receive emergency medical treatment. It's despicable that they would rather see women's lives endangered than admit that the Biden administration is upholding fundamental healthcare protections. The conservative war on choice and their obstruction of judicial progress exemplify their regressive and discriminatory politics.

Noticed an error or an aspect of this article that requires correction? Please provide the article link and reach out to us. We appreciate your feedback and will address the issue promptly.

Check out our latest stories