The Battle of Bandwidth: HDMI vs Ethernet Cables for 4K Video Transmission

Skylar Hawthorne

Updated Thursday, April 25, 2024 at 6:47 AM CDT

The Battle of Bandwidth: HDMI vs Ethernet Cables for 4K Video Transmission

Understanding the Differences in Data Compression and Bandwidth

In the world of 4K video transmission, the choice between HDMI and Ethernet cables becomes crucial. Both have their advantages and limitations when it comes to handling the data required for smooth 4K 60Hz video playback. Let's delve into the key differences between these two cable options.

Ethernet cables are capable of transmitting the necessary data for 4K 60Hz video due to data compression. Typically, the data on these cables is compressed to less than 30 megabits, significantly reducing the amount of data being transmitted. This compression allows Ethernet cables to handle the demands of 4K video efficiently.

On the other hand, HDMI cables transmit uncompressed data, sending each pixel's full Red, Green, and Blue colors one by one. This results in a much larger quantity of data being transferred. The sheer volume of data in HDMI requires the cable to be designed for quality, often limiting its length and causing the wire to warm up.

Regular Ethernet cables and network cards typically max out at 10Gbps, which is the same as HDMI 1.4. However, this is not enough for transmitting uncompressed 4K 60Hz video. It's important to note that video transmitted over a network is almost always compressed, reducing the required bandwidth. However, compression can introduce artifacts and latency, which are undesirable for a monitor output.

HDMI 2.1, with its impressive bit rate of 48Gbps, surpasses the capabilities of most Ethernet cables used at 1Gbps or 10Gbps. This makes HDMI a superior choice in terms of bandwidth for transmitting uncompressed video. HDMI is designed to be both high bandwidth and cost-effective, making it a more suitable option for those seeking to transmit uncompressed video.

While Ethernet cables can achieve speeds above 10Gbps, the network cards required for higher speeds tend to be expensive. In comparison, HDMI offers a more cost-effective solution for those looking to transmit uncompressed video.

Furthermore, HDMI 2.1 enables faster live data streaming compared to Ethernet cables. This allows for the transmission of 4K 120Hz video, while a 1Gbps Ethernet cable can only handle 4K 5Hz video if uncompressed and not buffered.

When it comes to transmitting 4K video, the choice between HDMI and Ethernet cables depends on various factors such as bandwidth requirements, cost, and the desired level of compression. HDMI cables excel in their ability to handle uncompressed video with higher bandwidth, making them an ideal choice for transmitting 4K 60Hz and even 4K 120Hz video. However, Ethernet cables can still be a viable option for compressed video transmission, especially when cost-effectiveness is a priority.

Noticed an error or an aspect of this article that requires correction? Please provide the article link and reach out to us. We appreciate your feedback and will address the issue promptly.

Check out our latest stories